- Details
Yoichi Koderaa, Koji Ukegawaa, Yutaka Mito*, Masashi Komoto†, Etsuro Ishikawa† and Tetsuo Nakayama
Abstract
Nitrogen compounds were separated efficiently from coal liquids by solvent extraction with methanol and water. Middle distillates of Wandoan and Battle River coal liquid and a mixture of model compounds were employed as feed oils. This paper reports the experimental conditions for the effective separation of nitrogen compounds, such as quinoline and indole. In particular, the effects of extraction solvents on extraction yield and selectivities of nitrogen compounds were investigated.
- Details
- Details
We've demonstrated that technologies exist to not only capture CO2 emissions, from coal power or coal-to-liquid factories, but to recycle it into more liquid fuel.But, another greenhouse gas - Nitrous Oxide - is emitted from coal-use processes, as well. And, even though it is generated in smaller quantities than CO2, it is also considered, on a weight-to-weight basis, to be a more potent agent of "global warming".Both gasses are sort of "lumped" together by regulatory bodies and agencies when it comes to the calculation of emission effects.As is getting to be routine, our South African coal-to-liquid friends, Sasol, have addressed, as in the enclosed article, the problem of NO2 emissions. And, they have addressed them so well that they are actually given "carbon credits" for their coal use processes, credits they can sell, like a commodity, to other greenhouse gas emitters whose processes aren't so "clean".Some excerpts:"Sasol, a South African Company has become the first company globally to register a nitrous oxide (N2O) abatement project using secondary catalyst technology to convert the greenhouse gas N2O into harmless nitrogen and oxygen gases."
"The project is expected to earn significant income through sales of the resulting carbon credits. A share of these carbon credits will be invested to benefit local community-based sustainable development projects."And, remember, we have documented that coal-derived liquid fuels actually burn cleaner than their petroleum-based counterparts.Producing our liquid fuels from coal would actually benefit the environment.
- Details
"For a plant making liquid fuel from coal, rather than using carbon monoxide and hydrogen as intermediates, which is the current method (in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and Sasol's processes - JtM), one can reduce the overall carbon dioxide emissions by using carbon dioxide and hydrogen as intermediates in the process, say the researchers."
"That example showed, paradoxically, if you use hydrogen and carbon dioxide, which looks like a worse alternative, you could actually do better," says Glasser (Prof. David Glasser, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa - JtM)."
"The example stated already reaches beyond mere research, and Glasser says that there is a pilot plant running in China and a demonstration plant in Australia, which incorporate these ideas."
The CO2 used as an intermediate for liquid fuel production can be generated intentionally as syngas from coal in a coal-to-liquid plant, or collected from coal power or coal-to-liquid plant incidental emissions, or sucked from the atmosphere itself. The Hydrogen can be electrolyzed from water - generating clean and green pure Oxygen as a by-product.
- Details
"The best way to make methanol is by steam reforming methane, produced when syngas - a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide - is turned into liquid hydrocarbons via reactions such as the Fischer-Tropsch process."
(We must assume by this, with our limited capacity and understanding, that methane is produced as a by-product of converting coal to liquid fuel via Fischer-Tropsch processing. Another bonus of the process, perhaps.)
"The process is used today to make diesel and other liquid fuels from coal, and kept South African cars going during the country's international isolation in the 1980s and 90s."
We send this only to reinforce the fact that the technology for making liquid fuels, and chemical manufacturing raw materials, from coal, is established and understood. Why it has not yet been reduced to broad commercial practice in the United States, with all the domestic economic benefits such an industry would create, is a question that must be answered. And, the answer, since we don't have such an industry, with all it's benefits, has to be wrong. It should be corrected.
